Lead lipstick and arsenic eyeliner: Should you clean your beauty routine?

It’s something I’ve always encouraged Pai customers to look closely at, but now it seems wider beauty press are also beginning to question the ingredients in cosmetics.

This week Daily Mail Online revealed the ugly secrets the beauty industry isn’t telling us – secrets that include the presence of lead, arsenic and mercury in mainstream make-up products.

According to a 2011 report (Heavy Metal Hazard: The Health Risks of Hidden Heavy Metals in Face Makeup), these metals were found in 49 popular products including Clinique foundation and L’Oreal mascara.

You won’t find them on the Ingredients Lists as no company uses them as ingredients.  Instead, they are impurities, often from minerals used as pigments.

The US Federal Drug Administration tested levels of lead in lipsticks (2010), and found the metal present at concentrations of up to 7 parts per million and an average of 1 part per million.

To put that into context, Colin’s Beauty Blog (written by a cosmetic scientist) calculates you would need to eat over 30,000 lipsticks to get a fatal dose.

That said, the FDA limit is 0.1 p.p.m lead in candy (which is eaten) and several of the lipsticks (which hopefully you don’t eat!) were over 3 p.p.m – so 3,000% above the recommended dose in food.

Trevor Butterworth at The Daily estimates you would need to eat 7-10 tubes in one sitting of the most contaminated lipstick to to have temporarily ingested enough lead to be concerned.

Robert Tisserand over at Personal Care Truth says that lead in American brands is too small to be a health concern, but that a Chinese lipstick had a lead level of 3,760 ppm - nearly 4 million % higher than the average lead content in US brand lipsticks.   I would stay away from Chinese brand lipsticks and makeup products I suspect might be counterfeit.

Most people don’t eat lipsticks (!), and if you buy from the main brands, there is no real health concern over contamination of cosmetics by metals.  However, it is an idea to keep your makeup away from children under 6 years old and perhaps consider cutting down on lipstick while pregnant.

I don’t know enough about mineral pigments to say whether natural and organic cosmetics have lower levels of contaminants than the mainstream brands.  I would expect them to be the same, but I am happy to be corrected!

What do you think about all this? Will it put you off make-up purchases in the future, or is it a negligible concern?

  • Brigitte12

     What makeup brand can I trust then ? Do you have any suggestion ?

  • http://colinsbeautypages.co.uk/ Colin

    Thanks for quoting me, but can I just add an important clarification.  I calculated that there is enough lead in 33,000 lipsticks to do some serious harm, but to actually get it into your body you would have to extract using a long process and strong acid.  Simply eating the lipstick would not be enough.  I give the full details in that post if anyone wants to try it. I don’t think there is any need to worry about any mainstream brand or reputable natural brand even if you are pregnant.  There are plenty of good reasons to keep lipstick away from small children regardless of lead content.  Given that the biggest source of lead is plant matter I think it is quite likely that the products with the highest lead levels are natural products with lots of that kind of thing -though I don’t imagine any of them are remotely dangerous.  Given how precisely these things can be measured and how hard it is to understand very small numbers I think it is only a matter of time before someone does an ‘organic products full of lead’ story.

  • Ed Saper

    Pleasure to quote you @3c16f40fe378777010a40432e1fe1836:disqus !  The offer still stands to pop by the Pai stand at the next Natural & Organic Trade show.

  • phullie

    very interesting to know about lipsticks, as im just getting into them atm! and also good to know for the future!!